Should we go to war because the newspapers and most commentators agree that it is “highly likely” Russia ordered the assassination of Mr. Skripal, a Russian expat and British citizen and his daughter Guilia, on UK soil?
Our Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, with his usual temperance of speech, suggests that it is “overwhelmingly likely” Putin personally ordered the attack. But while politicians are high on assumptions they are really low on evidence.
And the media are giving them a free ride.
Are we indeed going "over the top"?
Earlier in the week, the Guardian had a cartoon showing Putin as a blood drenched spider sitting on top of the world, with Theresa May flying up on a vacuum cleaner, to sweep him away (recalling both Nazi propaganda and a child’s nursery rhyme).
The last time this writer can remember such a frenzy of moral sureness, was when the UK were gearing up for an invasion of Iraq over the “overwhelming certainty” of Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. At that time some of us doubted the narrative but our voices were easily drowned out by Tony Blair’s 45 minute threat and Intelligence Dossiers.
A little bit of history
Of course the newspapers quickly established that this theory had little to sustain it, and CNN, in a notable broadcast from the streets of Caracas, spoke of "fantasy so fantastical it is hard to believe a government would give it the least credence".
America, they said, had not and would never engage in a crime like this.
Do you remember this?
Well, not surprising, because it never happened. But the main elements are similar to the attempted assassination of two people in Salisbury, England, And here, we are accepting the official line without any serious questioning at all.
As we will see below, there are serious questions as to whether Novichok was ever made by the USSR.
There are perplexing questions regarding how such an unstable and dangerous compound could be transported and administered.
There are important questions regarding the assertion that only the Russian State could produce a nerve agent such as this.
There is little or no mention in the media of the decommissioning of the alleged source of this agent, in the 1990's by an American team.
Why is no-one in the main stream British media doing due diligence and asking the questions being posed by well informed journalists in the alternative media?
There are good reasons to doubt Mrs May’s conclusions, but no one chooses to air them.
So we goad a nuclear power, who may (or may not) be guilty. But we simply disregard the law (international and UK) in doing so.
This writer is not asserting that Russia is not responsible but is pointing out that the media are totally failing in their duty to inform. By so doing they become complicit in whatever may flow from this, especially if Russia are entirely innocent.
(And under law they are indeed innocent until proven guilty.)
Did you know, for example, that Russia had requested a sample of the ‘Novichok’ nerve agent, right at the beginning, but has had no response from the Foreign Office, even though this would be protocol for such events?
Did you know, for example, that the so called Novichok agent was described first by a whistleblower, Vil S. Mirzayanov? He wrote a book called State Secrets, that appears to give the formulae for the ‘Novichok’ agent. But experts, real experts, question if his book is simply a work of fiction.
Judith Miller, in a New York Times article in 1999, writes:
“Earlier this year, the Pentagon informed Congress that it intends to spend up to $6 million under its Cooperative Threat Reduction program to demilitarize the so-called Chemical Research Institute, in Nukus, Uzbekistan. Soviet defectors and American officials say the Nukus plant was the major research and testing site for a new class of secret, highly lethal chemical weapons called ''Novichok,'' which in Russian means ‘new guy’.”
In other words it was a US company that had the task of cleaning up the mess left by the USSR. If Novichok was made there, they would have had access, and samples, Her full article can be accessed, here.
She also pointed out that the Hague-based agency, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, doubted the Uzbek site and been used for chemical production.
Porton Down doubts Novichok Exists
Did you know that Craig Murray, the ex British Ambassador to Uzbekistan (2002-2004) has written on March 14th 2018, that:
“As recently as 2016 Dr Robin Black, Head of the Detection Laboratory at the UK’s only chemical weapons facility at Porton Down, a former colleague of Dr David Kelly, published in an extremely prestigious scientific journal that the evidence for the existence of Novichoks was scant and their composition unknown.”
You may wish to read that quote again.
Because as the drums of outrage boom, and we edge, perhaps, closer to a terminal crisis, we may be arguing about something that simply does not exist.
The full article by Craig Murray can be found here, with quotes in full from Dr. Robin Black’s publication.
Dr Robin Black, is the Head of the Detection Laboratory at Porton Down, or was two years ago, and he doubts the existence of Novichok. But Theresa May and Boris Johnson are sure.
How come no-one in the western main stream media is following this up with some level of incredulity?
Finally, anyone who has followed BBC dramas will understand the concept of ‘wet work’.
Is anyone who has read this far, so naive, that they do not know that states in the West seek to murder elected leaders of foreign powers? The failures with Fidel Castro, all 600+ of them, are explored here. More worrying, is Operation Gladio, the ‘stay behind armies of NATO', who were behind the Bologna bombings in 1980.
Daniele Ganser, in his book NATO’s Secret Armies (2004) describes how CIA funded military had arms caches all over Europe. The most clear example is Italy, but Ganser opines that the system operated (and perhaps still does) across Europe.
The secret Gladio army, as Andreotti revealed, was well armed. The equipment provided by the CIA was buried in 139 hiding spots across the country in forests, meadows and even under churches and cemeteries. According to the explanations of Andreotti the Gladio caches included 'portable arms, ammunition, explosives, hand grenades, knives and daggers, 60 mm mortars, several 57 mm recoilless rifles, sniper rifles, radio transmitters, binoculars and various tools'.
Andreotti's sensational testimony did not only lead to an outcry concerning the corruption of the government and the CIA among the press and the population, but also to a hunt for the secret arms caches. Padre Giuciano recalls the day when the press came to search for the hidden Gladio secrets in his church with ambiguous feelings: 'I was forewarned in the afternoon when two journalists from "Il Gazzettino" asked me if I knew anything about arms deposits here at the church. They started to dig right here and found two boxes right away. Then the text also said a thirty centimetres from the window. So they came over here and dug down. One box was kept aside by them because it contained a phosphorous bomb. They sent the Carabinieri outside whilst two experts opened this box, another had two machine guns in it. All the guns were new, in perfect shape. They had never been used.’
The greatest outrage was the Bologna bombing in 1980, that many still (falsely) believe was perpetrated by left wing terrorists, when the opposite was true, It was carried out by right wing functionaries of the State. Full background to Gladio can be found here in a BBC documentary, and here and here.
So what is the relevance of Operation Gladio to attacks on Russian citizens (past and present) on the streets of Salisbury? Few people in the West are familiar with Gladio and Gladio B, but this is no conspiracy theory. It is established as factual that quasi government bodies attacked their own citizens on European soil for certain geopolitical ends.
Did this happen in Salisbury, two weeks ago? The current writer does not know - but then neither does anyone (outside of Intelligence circles) know either. It is the evident fact that this is not even being considered in the UK media, that should be a profound worry.
Would fail as a scenario in McMafia?
The relevance of this is that if state operatives wish to murder they do. This includes NATO states. And this has demonstrably involved citizens of NATO countries as victims.
Probably all states have departments that do work like this, including Russia. Only, normally, we never know for sure. Good wet work teams have cut outs that make it hard to trace who gives the orders (it took many years to find the real perpetrators of the Bologna bombing).
We are being led to believe:
1. That Putin personally ordered a hit an a low level double agent who had received a full pardon from Russia
2. That the method used was so inept, it involved a nerve agent only “made in Russia”.
3. That the method used put innocent bystanders at risk (including a policeman).
4. That an attempt was made "by Putin or his cronies" to murder a Russian citizen who frequently is in Moscow (Guilia, the daughter of Skripal, lives there). Such an act would be against Russian law, and certainly repellent to most Russian citizens.
Well, maybe all this is true, and certainly it seems accepted as such by most, except maybe Jeremy Corbyn, who is counselling caution.
But if this scenario was suggested in a drama pitched to the BBC as part of McMafia, it would be thrown out as completely implausible for failing the simple test of Cui Bono.
... and what you are doing!
Can the mind leave the body? If so, what are the implications? Would the military explore these possibilities?
In 1983 the cornerstone BBC science program did a programme called The Case of ESP. The current writer used it later with his psychology students to raise questions about the nature of the mind.
Although Horizon presented many aspects of Extra Sensory Perception in considerable detail, much space was given to the total sceptics who affirmed that phenomena like Remote Viewing and remote control of physical objects was simply impossible. No real evidence existed they argued, and where there was so called evidence, it was simply fraudulent.
The programme is still available via YouTube, and remains of great interest even today.
Here is the original episode, uncut. It is still well worth watching.
This sceptical position was the accepted ‘scientific view’ of the time. It is the accepted view now. Science does not allow that the mind and body are separate. If you believe in this separation you are a dreamer, and as Rupert Sheldrake discovered, your career in mainstream science is ruined.
The idea that the alphabet agencies were doing Remote Viewing or similar in the 1980's or later in the 1990's, was vigorously denied. Anyone seriously suggesting extra sensory perception was feasible and being used by the military would be considered a crank at best or a ‘conspiracy theorist’ if they made too much of it.
So what is Remote Viewing?
Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff, working at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) cooperated with psychics, using various protocols. A target (usually a place) would be chosen randomly and someone would go to the place assigned (usually through a map reference). The subject, in a Faraday Cage, in other words without any access to electromagnetic information, would 'tune in' and then would draw what they saw.
As is evident in the examples shown in the old Horizon programme, the 'hits' were simply extraordinary. It is hard to see what they achieved and to still maintain that it was all by 'chance' or by picking up on cues or fraud or any of the other ways the phenomenon was explained away.
One of the most successful subjects was Pat Price. See below for the accuracy of the target he was able to envisage using only remote viewing.
So, it's still rubbish, right?
Actually, not! Now, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), it is clear that the official denials were simply convenient lies. Those scientists most vociferous about the ‘impossibility’ look a little bit like shills now, seeking to prevent serious consideration of the implications of the mind being quite distinct from the body.
That is in many ways still the case. The only difference now is that we have abundant evidence that Remote Viewing was being successfully employed by the American military (and we must assume the Chinese and Russian military too), and the denials were a distraction.
Here is a screen shot of the CIA page presenting a link to some of the Targ Puthoff research.
"Kept top secret for "national security" reasons, hundreds of thousands of pages of remote viewing documents were carefully stored away as the nation's remote viewers gradually refined their ability to produce drawings of what they saw at a distant location. The existence of the program was flatly denied. Finally in 1995, a small percentage of these documents were released to the public through the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), proving the existence of the program. Even this small percentage released amounts to nearly 100,000 pages of official remote viewing documents."
"The existence of the [remote viewing] programme was flatly denied."
At the time, anyone suggesting that was so would be labelled a conspiracy theorist. In fact if you suggest to the average person in the street nowadays that these powers exist and are used by the military and intelligence services you will still be considered a 'conspiracy theorist' even though the evidence is now available for all to see.
But two things have now become clear. The military and intelligence services in the USA were doing 'psychic' research and were using sensitive and unusual individuals to 'mind travel'. They were also quite happy to deny they were doing this and label those who asked awkward questions as nuts, conspiracy nerds or worse.
One of the best or most successful of the psychics employed was Ingo Swann. His story is given below, and involved 'viewing' parts of the solar system in his mind. In an autobiography that he wrote, he claims to have viewed parts of the moon in great details. His extraordinary story can be found in various of his many books, including this one, here.
A selection of declassified evidence can be found here
Short example, with Russell Targ - 5 minutes
Ingo Swann and the sealed predictions
The most famous of all remote viewers was a flamboyant civilian by the name of Ingo Swann. This remarkable man was noted for predicting in 1973 what NASA's pioneer probes to Jupiter would find once they reached the gaseous planet for the first close-up view ever. Swann sealed copies of his predictions in envelopes and gave them to many noted scientists who were later astounded at his near 100% accuracy. He also scared military security by being able to literally read files locked in a thick safe on a secure base.
More about Swann can be found in the article, here
And today ... ?
We now can be reasonably certain the US military and intelligence agencies were using psychics to do remote viewing. Evidence of this is now in the public domain because of the FOIA. In the 1980's and 1990's those suggesting this was the case were considered credulous fools with no scientific acumen.
Why would we assume that the intelligence and military would have simply stopped what is - on the face of the evidence - a very effective means of espionage? Would anyone 'whistleblowing' today be believed? Or would they be dropped in the dustbin marked 'conspiracy'.
Given the documentation of this piece of recent history is now available, and given also that the implications for science are so huge, is this another case of the dog that did not bark?
The very fact that this has not been the subject of in depth journalistic exploration is itself intriguing, is it not?
Wars generally involve lies.
They start with them and
They end with them.
To send young people to die for older people's benefit requires getting the young to believe these lies. It was ever thus.
We know this. We've read history. We've seen the films. WE know the truth.
But if we are caught up in a hugely well orchestrated propaganda war, for crucial geopolitical ends, would we spot when it is that our minds are being played with?
One Pulitzer Prize winning journalist suggests that that is exactly what is occurring.
Does it matter if the mainstream media lie to you?
No one trusts the media any more, do they?
And yet, the moment there is something like an election, or a fire in a high-rise building, or a plane that goes missing, we all have to turn to the media to find out what is going on. If lies and truth are woven together in a compelling narrative, and our subsequent behaviour is influenced – even if we know that certain media sources are not always trustworthy – then it does matter what the main stream media says.
The Russiagate controversy is unravelling.
A war has broken out in America.
It has spread across the Internet.
This is a subtle war, attempting to destroy several individual's reputations. It is a war designed to split aspects of what might be called the Alternative Community. These are people who are well aware of what is going on politically and in the breakaway society(ies). It is happening now because the information coming out is coming close to allowing a tipping point, with real disclosure,
The war is essentially spiritual.
The Fall of Camelot
How you view the murder of John F. Kennedy pretty much determines how you see the world today.
Camelot fell with his murder.
History was captured with every lie that has been told about who killed him and why. The myth around his death is a dark tale full of falsehood and deceit. Not much research or integrity is needed to establish the official account is false - yet it is still presented by the whole of the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM). The fact not a chink appears in that armour of lies, should alert anyone with an open mind that the story is false or deeply suspect at best.
The article by Dr. Preston James sets the record straight.
Martin Luther King was not killed by James Early Ray.
This was established in a civil court in 1999.
We know, and there is photographic evidence, who killed him and just how many shooters there were that day, and how many 'spotters'.
The lawyer, William F Pepper has investigated this story for 40 years. He has met many of the main participants and witnesses. He had to leave America and live in London for years, because of threats to his own life and children. In his latest book he establishes with forensic detail, exactly who did kill King and, more importantly, who has kept this covered up.
Any whistleblower, by definition, faces a mountain of disbelief as they are going against what is accepted by the majority as true. It is even more difficult if the subject is activity in outer space, as few (if any) can corroborate what someone writes about secret programmes beyond the Earth. This is compounded when the narrative involves beings from distant star systems or other dimensions.
Welcome to Corey Goode’s world.
Corey Goode has recently come under attack from several people in the Alternative News community, not least Bill Ryan* and Steven Greer. Both these speakers and broadcasters, are influential, and have been the conduit for many respected whistleblowers of their own. Suggestions from them that Corey Goode is at best a dupe and at worst, part of an elaborate psyops program, are bound to cause doubt.
*[Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan’s Camelot, have given Bob Dean plenty of air time and support. His stories are no less fantastic than Goode’s.]
We are in the middle of an unspoken war.
A huge battle is taking place for the soul of the earth. Some of what is going on is visible, and makes its way into the newspapers. Some of what is going on is much more deeply hidden. This surfaces in the “badlands” of the alternative media.
To get an accurate assessment of exactly what is taking place is very difficult. Very few have a complete picture. Those who do are, in all likelihood, parts of the Deep State. Others, who may know a lot through various means, have to be cautious, for to put their heads above the parapet is to invite attack, either literally or through ridicule. (See example here.)
To keep somewhat abreast of what is taking place requires reading widely, a deep understanding of hidden history, as well as an appreciation of the sacred, and the spiritual. Few, including this writer, can claim to have mastered each of those fields.
Outrage at a brilliant drama
In The Guardian today, Denis Campbell summarises the 'professional' criticism of Netflix's new drama, 13 Reasons Why. The article is worth reading, but how many of those who criticised the drama actually watched it, in sequence, all through? Any?
This writer and his family did watch over the Easter period. The drama is compelling. It is not horrific, in the sense of a 'horror story'. It is horrific to be presented, dramatically, with the way in which the teenage years are a universe unto themselves, and how fraught they can be for many of us, and difficult to pass through unscathed.
... and what the hell happened last week?
Pictures create reality
Iconic pictures can shape how events are seen.
The kiss shown above, whether real or staged, caught the mood of nations in a moment, and remains one of the best known icons of WW2.
Vietnam became a war told through pictures.
The little girl running from a napalm attack (when the US did use chemical weapons by the way) seared the souls of a generation and played a huge part in the enormous anti war movement.
Live, smiling children do not launch missiles. Pale, dead children do.
Acts of war do not safely rest on highly emotional images, but should only result from careful consideration of intelligence that can (as far as possible) be verified. This has not – as far as we can judge – happened with regard to Syria.
False Flag Attacks
A false flag attack is when an action is planned, initiated and accomplished by a covert group, and made to look like it has been carried out by someone entirely different. Such an act can be used as the justification to overthrow a regime or to introduce martial law or to go to war.
All's fair in love, war and politics, it seems.
Would it bother you to learn that a system was set up before Trump was inaugurated, to destroy the Trump Presidency? If that system had a sophisticated and very well funded misinformation campaign, would that be justified?
Well, it appears that this is exactly what is going on, with the willing connivance of many media outlets. Seems democracy is a great idea for other nations, but can happily be subverted in the USA. And this time it is not the Russians (if it ever was).
The article below is by the investigative reporter from France, Thierry Mason.
Two excellent films; one in 2015 exploring the world we are moving into, where Artificial Intelligence could begin to mimic and possibly surpass our own, the second in 2016 with the arrival of Alien Intelligence on Earth, in a way that is enigmatic.
Both films are designed to make us think, rather than just to entertain.
Carmen Boulter continues her interview with Dark Journalist, and reveals more pictures she took at a site in Turkey – now under military control –showing remarkable artefacts that, she suggests are dated at 10,000BCE.
To 'those who know' it is clear that the tabloid press in the UK at least, is being used to place a regular supply of stories about Unidentified Aerial Objects and NASA speculations about life beyond the Solar system. This is seen as soft disclosure. No longer are the stories wrapped with derision, But of course is is de rigueur that the phrase "Conspiracy Theorist" is used.
In this story the object is the "size of Jupiter". So, for those who are not keen on maths, that is blooming enormous.
The details of the Mirror article are here. And another article about the same thing, this time in a Russian paper, is here.
Bizarre images captured by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft, which is jointly run by Nasa and the European Space Agency, appear to show and object hovering close to the surface.
From the UK tabloid, The Mirror
"The times they are a'changin ... "
Something is going on.
There is a craziness in the air. the USA seems to be suffering a psychotic breakdown. In the UK we are divided (over Brexit) as never before in the lifetime of this writer. France may elect a leader who will take France into a Frexit, or so we are told. Refugees, immigrants or rabid fundamentalists (depends who you listen to) are crowding on our borders (in both Europe and the USA, allegedly).
In a previous post, here, we saw how the Gnostics believed in an ignorant and dark Creator God called Yaldabaoth.
This myth appeared to be a distortion of a profound teaching from Plato's Timaeus. But the Gnostic doctrine may have been capturing a reality that applies specifically to Earth and the subtle systems that surround it, within what esoteric teachings refer to as the astral and etheric realms. These ideas, rejected by mainstream science, perhaps have their place in the emerging science of plasma and the electric universe theory.
Sibel Edmonds can legitimately be called the most gagged woman in American history. She lost her job at the FBI whilst helping in the investigation of huge corruption in high places in the USA, an investigation the Bush administration was moving fast to shut down.
"According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, roughly 800,000 children are reported missing each year in the United States -- that's roughly 2,000 per day."
Source: ABC News confirmed here
Quote from BBC report about the same statistic:
"A 2002 study funded by the US Department of Justice. This examined data for 1999 from a range of sources, including police reports, and interviews with parents and children, and found 797,500 children were reported missing across the country."
Murray Morison is a novelist living in Crete
Posts can be reproduced in other blogs provided they are copied in full with a link back to this site.
When a teenage priestess, living 5,000 years ago in Ancient Egypt, connects with Rhory, an English schoolboy visiting the British Museum, she puts herself and him in grave danger.
Click here to learn more about M C Morison's time slip book
Is our History Simply Wrong
The World's Oldest City
Is God Fair
Queen Nefertiti and Treasure in Turkey
Dark Deeds - Mind Lab
Darwin and the Mousetrap
One eyed monsters
Do Angels have wings
Psyche Soul and Mind 2
Psyche Soul and Mind 1
Atlantis Old and New 2
Atlantis Old and New 1
Secret space programme
Spirit and spirits
Awareness and Higher mind
The fake news war
Citizens hearings on disclosure
Understanding the Goddess
Thrive - did you miss this
Fake news and the alt media
Ascension Part 2
Ascension Part 1
Mundi - a mind trap
The Mundane and mundi 2
The Mundane and mundi 1