Don't Worry About dirt in Vaccines!

.  .  .  but I do!

A very recent study has found containments in 43 out of 44 vaccine samples. That is a bit spooky as the only 'pure' vaccine was the only one in the group aimed at animals.

More spooky is the fact that shortly after this study was published a long on-line debunking article appeared.

How are we to discern right from wrong here and risk from welfare?

To enter the vaccine debate is to go where angels fear to tread.
But as the current writer knows the power of homoeopathy with first hand experience, the presence of nano-particles of poison is disturbing.

The Study

 The research was carried out be a team led by Dr. Antonietta Gatti., of the University of Modena and Regio Emilia (as it happens one of the oldest universities in the world, with a current specialism in medicine).

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler interviewed Dr. Gatti, who pointed out that the pollutants discovered could result in cancer and other serious ailments.


A key question from a very recent interview (found in full here).

---

JLW: What is the medical significance of finding aggregates and clusters in the vaccines you studied?
AG: Certainly the particles, be they isolated, aggregated or clustered, are not supposed to be there. They are foreign bodies our tissues can’t recognize and, because of that, they are perceived as potential enemies. The biological reactions are expected to be fairly complicated, with macrophages that try to engulf them the way they do normally with bacteria and parasites. Unfortunately, though, the particles we found then and keep finding now in vaccines are not biodegradable. So, all macrophages’ efforts are useless and, ... the particles may be especially toxic. Cytokines and pro-inflammatory substances in general are released ... This involves inflammation, and, in the long run, such a chronic condition can lead to cancer.

Above the law

Following a Supreme Court ruling, on February 22, 2011  drug companies are shielded from all liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by government when companies could have made a safer vaccine.
This in effect puts the drug companies above the law, even if toxicity in their products cause harm.
But a scientific study demonstrating that such containments are the norm rather than the exception, could cause public opinion to change.

Enter the apologists

In researching this post, the current writer came across a long and detailed article on a 'science blog' purporting to show that Dr. Gatti's work could simply be ignored. The defensive 'debunking' suggests that the Italian research has hit a nerve.

You can read it here if you wish. the writer asserts, against the conclusions of Gatti et al, that the polluted vaccines were "surprisingly free of contaminants".

But Gatti explains in some detail how these nano-contaminants can persist and collect with unknown consequences. Given the homoeopathic principle of the action of tiny amounts of a substance, or its 'pattern' in fluid, we should perhaps not be so insouciant as Orac of the ScienceBlogs.

---

The full interview with Dr. Gatti's about her work can be found here,